but you're kind of holding her to a ridiculous standard that 100% of her songs must be perfect.
frankly, most of her songs are, which is a far, far higher success rate than most musicians ever come close to enjoying.
Eureka wrote:but you're kind of holding her to a ridiculous standard that 100% of her songs must be perfect.
It is a matter of the material not having the same intrigue as her earlier efforts. (I didn't like YS all that much. Though the YS Street Band EP is rather redeeming and felt that was a better direction)
ribbonbows wrote:Eureka wrote:but you're kind of holding her to a ridiculous standard that 100% of her songs must be perfect.
It is a matter of the material not having the same intrigue as her earlier efforts. (I didn't like YS all that much. Though the YS Street Band EP is rather redeeming and felt that was a better direction)
"and how do you determine that?"
I don't think I would've been happy with the record if it had less material on it.
Eureka wrote:I don't think I would've been happy with the record if it had less material on it.
How would you know? You only know the album as a three disc product.
teenagelightning wrote:don't be so dreadfully Kantian.
What I'm saying is that each track on the record I am very much in love with, so it's perfect as is for me.
I don't think I would've been happy with the record if it had less material on it.
coasts wrote:Eureka, don't you think you should give the album your full attention before critiquing it? your position is weakened by the fact that you passed over songs that didn't immediately speak to you.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests