• * Register
  • * Login
  • * FAQ
  • *POTD
Inflammatory Writ / Shocking New Review of Milk-Eyed Mender from Sputnikmusic

reviews, interviews & snippets

Postby AgesilausLacis on 10 Jul 2010, 02:46



http://www.sputnikmusic.com/album.php?reviewid=36991

Popular music has known its share of unusual voices. From Bob Dylan to Billy Corgan, singers whose voices might have initially aggravated the average listener have been able to achieve success. Some have not even always managed to sing in key, like Ian Curtis of Joy Division, who compensated for this deficiency by the exceptional strength and timbre of his voice. Regardless, the general consensus on those that have succeeded is usually that their voice somehow “fit” the music that they were singing. However vague and impressionistic this judgment might seem, it must be admitted on an intuitive level that there is some truth to it. This does not prevent these singers’ voices, of course, from occasionally slipping into the intolerable. Even in the space of a single album filled with hits, Corgan, for example, has attempted to sing on tracks for which his strange, nasally voice was clearly not appropriate. Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness comes to mind. But the hope is that such vocalists hit the mark more often than they miss.

Then there is the Joanna Newsom of The Milk-Eyed Mender. Though it must perhaps be noted that her voice has shown considerable improvement since her horrendous 2004 debut, the fact remains that here — on Newsom’s first full-length release — the vocals are inexcusably terrible. Yet in spite of this seemingly obvious truth, there are numerous fans of the California native’s music who defend this album as her finest work. To some, Newsom’s subsequent releases have betrayed the ideal established by this early record by going more mainstream in their vocal approach. They make the bizarre claim that the nauseating voice she adopts on The Milk-Eyed Mender holds some sort of charm in its blissful naïveté, strangely endearing in its idiosyncrasy. In introducing the album to the uninitiated, they usually provide the disclaimer that once one gets past her initially off-putting vocals they will recognize its brilliance. The listener must not be deceived by this anticipation, however; those who make such claims are liars.

Most descriptions of Newsom’s voice on The Milk-Eyed Mender fail to capture the true depths of its horror. They settle for the standard — by now hackneyed — characterization of the vocals as “childlike.” At times, this may suffice. But at others, Newsom’s voice on the record is more reminiscent of a demented she-gnome or the deaf, half-idiot sister of some Laura Ingalls frontier family. Somewhere around the two minute mark of the song “Sadie,” Newsom launches into one of the most obnoxious vocal lines in recorded history. Even in parts that are relatively more whimsical, like “Sprout and the Bean,” her voice is incredibly irritating. It single-handedly ruins one of the few actually impressive harp performances on the album. As if this was not horrible enough, on “Peach, Plum, and Pear,” Newsom’s singing reaches new heights of insufferability. I defy the listener to sit through the repetition of the line “Nah nah nah-nah nah-nah” without clawing out his eyes. Her yodeling throughout the track, moreover, is plainly intolerable.

Still, while defenders of The Milk-Eyed Mender might be willing to allow that some are simply not “sophisticated” or “open-minded” enough to accept Newsom’s vocals, they often point to the use of the harp on the record as unimpeachable proof of its musical merit. They maintain that this cannot be contested, even by the staunchest critic. This only showcases the extent of their own ignorance, however. Most of the harp parts on The Milk-Eyed Mender are exceedingly simplistic. To be generous, they are perhaps comparable to Debussy’s harp orchestration of Erik Satie’s Trois Gymnopédies, which would be more of a compliment if it were not one of the former’s most notorious blunders. Newsom exploits the harp’s naturally dreamy quality, covering over the sickly mushroom-nightmare that lies beneath. All too often, the harp is used to play extremely conventional folk chord progressions. Every time the harpsichord sounds in “Peach, Plum, Pear,” it's easy to imagine Mozart walking up to her and slapping her across the face with the sheet music to one of his minuets. Of course, Newsom’s admirers here applaud her for showing such courageous “ingenuity,” for not feeling shackled by the rules of traditional folk instrumentation. What they fail to recognize is that this is all part of Newsom’s gimmick, just another aspect of her calculated eccentricity. Perhaps one should give her credit, though. After all, enough hipster bastards have been tricked by it to earn her an audience.

The last line of defense that is commonly trotted out in support of The Milk-Eyed Mender rests on Newsom’s celebrated reputation as a lyricist. Luckily, short work can be made of this claim. Nearly all of her so-called lyrical wit consists in the pseudo-clever combination of unexpected or unlikely words with one another. It results in what the Russian critic Vissarion Belinskii called, with reference to his friend Gogol's 1847 published correspondence, a “sluttish hullabaloo of words and phrases.” “I killed my dinner with karate/kick ’em in the face, taste the body.” This, along with a somber vocal line, is enough to make Newsom either seem cute or uncannily poetic. Other times, Newsom tries to give the impression of possessing some sort of sagely insight. This is most often accomplished by referencing huge concepts (like the nature of capitalism) in a sort of offhand, indirect manner, filled with knowing familiarity. Another way she achieves this effect is by waxing aphoristic, handing out negative axioms (“Never get so attached to a poem/you forget truth that lacks lyricism”) like she was reading directly out of Poor Richard's Almanack. In this way does Newsom appear to tap into some hidden reserve of folksy, homespun wisdom.

Thus, on a vocal, instrumental, and lyrical level, Newsom’s The Milk-Eyed Mender proves an utter failure. Though her last few releases have shown signs of improvement, her first record stands as an eternal testament to the deluded tendency of hipsters to latch onto anything that seems to exhibit quaint eccentricity and call it brilliant, no matter how wretched the piece of music may be.

1.5/5
Last edited by AgesilausLacis on 20 Dec 2010, 22:41, edited 1 time in total.


AgesilausLacis
 
Posts: 16
Top

Postby polliwog on 11 Jul 2010, 07:55



A very different take from another sputnikmusic review posted here. I really did 'laugh out loud' several times while reading Michael Jordan (GoAT)'s review. I guess it's safe to assume that he's not likely to be a member of this forum. :lol:


Hir-sefydlog, aelod uchel ei pharch.
User avatar
polliwog
Chim-choo-ree
 
Posts: 1505
Location: Here
Top

Postby oneofthose on 11 Jul 2010, 11:50



Everything that reviewer said is undermined by the vile and extremely sexist jokes he makes about having sex with Joanna. I still have no idea what a hipster is, but I'd trust their taste over someone who sees no problem with writing this, under their review:

"i'd fuck her once. it'd be rough and crazy, the only way that insane, precocious bitches like sex after that i wouldn't return her phone calls though"

Brilliant.


oneofthose
Tadpole
 
Posts: 94
Location: London
  • Website
Top

Postby polliwog on 11 Jul 2010, 12:58



I didn't read the comments...but I still think the review was funny because the guy seems so clueless.


Hir-sefydlog, aelod uchel ei pharch.
User avatar
polliwog
Chim-choo-ree
 
Posts: 1505
Location: Here
Top

Postby oneofthose on 11 Jul 2010, 16:43



polliwog wrote:I didn't read the comments...but I still think the review was funny because the guy seems so clueless.


Yes, it's a weird kind of clueless. Because he's obviously very well read (and keen to make sure the reader knows it, too). But he seems determined to prove that Joanna's art and success is somehow manufactured by and for these so-called hipsters, which is a very strange view of the world. And he's arguing from the belief that he knows absolutely what is good and bad about singing voices, harp playing and lyric writing. I'd dare to suggest that no one can speak from such an authority.

Perception in reviews is interesting. I saw Bob Dylan play live for the umpteenth time last weekend. I came away feeling like I'd seen his best performance in decades. I thought he was inspired, energised, engaging, happy, inventive and musically and vocally brilliant. Yet I've read a review where the critic uses that gig as proof that Dylan no longer cares about his music, stating that the show was truly dreadful with Bob showing contempt for the audience and barely bothering to sing or perform. Which of us was right?


oneofthose
Tadpole
 
Posts: 94
Location: London
  • Website
Top

Postby polliwog on 14 Jul 2010, 07:09



OMG! O__O I just visited LJ's Milkeyed_Mender posting of this review, and I realize now that I was wrong. He is a member of this forum. In fact, he's the one who posted the review. Great first post, dude! :lol:


Hir-sefydlog, aelod uchel ei pharch.
User avatar
polliwog
Chim-choo-ree
 
Posts: 1505
Location: Here
Top

Postby AgesilausLacis on 20 Jul 2010, 05:28



oneofthose wrote:Everything that reviewer said is undermined by the vile and extremely sexist jokes he makes about having sex with Joanna. I still have no idea what a hipster is, but I'd trust their taste over someone who sees no problem with writing this, under their review:

"i'd fuck her once. it'd be rough and crazy, the only way that insane, precocious bitches like sex after that i wouldn't return her phone calls though"

Brilliant.

Admittedly these are sexist lines, though it should be borne in mind that they were written in response to several other posters speculating about a typical "Would you...?" scenario. And I should hope it is pretty obvious that I wrote them sarcastically. This may be something that's in poor taste to joke about, but whatever.

In fact, a lot of it came from an AIM conversation I was having with a friend around when those lines were written:

MichaelJordan: (9:39:59 PM)i also destroyed Saetia's A Retrospective and Joanna Newsom's horrible first album
MichaelJordan: (9:40:17 PM)and that one Animal Collective album
therealNas: (9:40:35 PM)dude
therealNas: (9:40:41 PM)link to
therealNas: (9:40:44 PM)joanna newsom
therealNas: (9:41:00 PM)only thing funnier than music nerds fighting for their musical balls is
therealNas: (9:41:07 PM)them fighting for their musical and literal balls
therealNas: (9:41:13 PM)because they are lik
therealNas: (9:41:14 PM)e
MichaelJordan: (9:41:16 PM)http://www.sputnikmusic.com/album.php?reviewid=36991
therealNas: (9:41:21 PM)perversely in love with her
MichaelJordan: (9:41:25 PM)i know

Anyway, I hope it didn't offend anyone or detract from the substantial points I made in the actual review.
Last edited by AgesilausLacis on 03 Dec 2010, 02:39, edited 1 time in total.


AgesilausLacis
 
Posts: 16
Top

Postby meadowlark on 22 Jul 2010, 07:14



AgesilausLacis wrote:... This may be something that's in poor taste to joke about, but whatever.


Idiot. So, we can all assume you are about 15 years old and a virgin?


seems I have stolen a horse
User avatar
meadowlark
 
Posts: 40
Top

Postby AgesilausLacis on 22 Jul 2010, 18:46



meadowlark wrote:
AgesilausLacis wrote:... This may be something that's in poor taste to joke about, but whatever.


Idiot. So, we can all assume you are about 15 years old and a virgin?

No, because neither are true.

haha

But thanks for trying. How about attending to my argument itself?


AgesilausLacis
 
Posts: 16
Top

Postby meadowlark on 25 Jul 2010, 10:51



AgesilausLacis wrote:
meadowlark wrote:
AgesilausLacis wrote:... This may be something that's in poor taste to joke about, but whatever.


Idiot. So, we can all assume you are about 15 years old and a virgin?

No, because neither are true.

haha

But thanks for trying. How about attending to my argument itself?

Sorry, which argument would that be? The 'making fatuous sexist statements, acknowledging that they're in bad taste, but saying 'whatever"' one? Nope, won't be 'attending' to that one, mate.


seems I have stolen a horse
User avatar
meadowlark
 
Posts: 40
Top

Postby AgesilausLacis on 25 Jul 2010, 16:11



meadowlark wrote:Sorry, which argument would that be? The 'making fatuous sexist statements, acknowledging that they're in bad taste, but saying 'whatever"' one? Nope, won't be 'attending' to that one, mate.

No, I was thinking of the argument laid out in the review itself, not some statement I made offhand in the thread attached to it. You know, where reasonable people would tend to look if they're having a real discussion of something.


AgesilausLacis
 
Posts: 16
Top

Postby ragtag on 25 Jul 2010, 21:25



AgesilausLacis wrote:
meadowlark wrote:Sorry, which argument would that be? The 'making fatuous sexist statements, acknowledging that they're in bad taste, but saying 'whatever"' one? Nope, won't be 'attending' to that one, mate.

No, I was thinking of the argument laid out in the review itself, not some statement I made offhand in the thread attached to it. You know, where reasonable people would tend to look if they're having a real discussion of something.


can you explain why anyone here would take you seriously enough to discuss this album with you? your "argument" that the album is horrible and lacking any merit whatsoever - and that Newsom herself is some formulaic act designed to dupe the hipster masses - is not likely to foster much discussion in... you know... a forum full of her fans. especially keeping in mind the disgusting comments which followed your review (did you really say you would "eat her ass"? really?). your assertion that the comments were egged on by someone else doesn't excuse anything. finally, writing a "shocking" review 6 years after the fact and then coming here to provoke discussion (i.e. congratulate yourself) is kinda weird - like you've had this bottled up ever since the Milk-Eyed Mender came out. O__O it's as if Joanna Newsom burned you in a previous life.


User avatar
ragtag
Tadpole
 
Posts: 57
Location: Chicago
Top

Postby Slabbers on 21 Aug 2010, 12:12



Do not feed the troll!


Slabbers
 
Posts: 1
Top

Postby Spelunker on 01 Oct 2010, 08:57



AgesilausLacis...

Fact: Joanna Newsom has made thousands (maybe even millions) off of record sales / touring. So regardless of whether or not her following is comprised purely of 'hipsters', she is still more successful, respected, and talented than you.

Fact: You are probably sitting in your bedroom, hunched over a crusty keyboard trying to defend your desperate review of an album that came out 6 years ago (and on a Joanna Newsom fan site none-the-less).

I am feeling so much secondhand embarrassment for you right now.


Spelunker
Tadpole
 
Posts: 51
Top

Postby Relayor on 07 Nov 2010, 22:56



AgesilausLacis wrote:....Anyway, I hope it didn't offend anyone or detract from the substantial points I made in the actual review.

I can confess having guffawed once during my reading of your review/original post; this response was devoid of any fellow-feeling, I assure you. You must be a spectacularly homely person;--There are a few eligible explanations for your behavior, one being a wretched outward appearance.

Notice that I didn't make reference to your critical taste for Joanna's work but to your behavior.


User avatar
Relayor
Seahorse
 
Posts: 144
  • Website
Top

Postby AgesilausLacis on 23 Nov 2010, 05:07



Relayor wrote:I can confess having guffawed once during my reading of your review/original post; this response was devoid of any fellow-feeling, I assure you. You must be a spectacularly homely person;--There are a few eligible explanations for your behavior, one being a wretched outward appearance.

Notice that I didn't make reference to your critical taste for Joanna's work but to your behavior.


I don't see what my appearance would have to do with anything, even if I were ugly (haha). Hypercritical misanthropes come in all shapes and sizes.

All that this sort of hogshit comes to is only as good as the following:

There are a few eligible explanations for your defense of Joanna Newsom's obnoxiously childlike voice, one being your quasi-pedophilic infatuation with it. Another being the millions of sperm you've lost while masturbating to her godawful records.
Last edited by AgesilausLacis on 08 Dec 2010, 21:20, edited 1 time in total.


AgesilausLacis
 
Posts: 16
Top

Postby AgesilausLacis on 23 Nov 2010, 06:32



Spelunker wrote:AgesilausLacis...

Fact: Joanna Newsom has made thousands (maybe even millions) off of record sales / touring. So regardless of whether or not her following is comprised purely of 'hipsters', she is still more successful, respected, and talented than you.


The only thing the thousands or millions of dollars she made would prove is that she's enjoyed a great deal of (financial) success from her record sales/touring. But then again, this can be said of a lot of popular musicians, many of whom are neither talented or respected. There are too many examples of this for me to even cite, so use your imagination.

As for myself, I'd take most of the mindless pop trash that's consumed by the great unwashed masses over Joanna Newsom and the quaint little niche market she's carved out for herself. It's more honest -- at least your average shitty pop record doesn't try to dupe you into thinking it has any artistic merit.


AgesilausLacis
 
Posts: 16
Top

Postby polliwog on 23 Nov 2010, 08:17



Alex, it should be obvious to any fan of Joanna that this schmuck is not one. Is there any good reason to put up with him/her/it any longer? If it requires a vote, you know what mine is. Exercise of authority can be a wonderful and invigorating thing. Exercise!


Hir-sefydlog, aelod uchel ei pharch.
User avatar
polliwog
Chim-choo-ree
 
Posts: 1505
Location: Here
Top

Postby polliwog on 23 Nov 2010, 15:57



Alex, how much clearer does it need to get? Oh, that's right! There has to be a mandate, not just polliwog's opinion.


Hir-sefydlog, aelod uchel ei pharch.
User avatar
polliwog
Chim-choo-ree
 
Posts: 1505
Location: Here
Top

Postby bandana.blues on 06 Dec 2010, 06:52



So, we should include you as someone in the group of angry and vocal critics who feel like her fans are fake or being tricked or fed hipster food or something? Good for you! But posting the review, of which you are clearly very proud, on a site like this is really just self aggrandizing and a reflection of the basic narcissistic premise that if you don't appreciate something it must not have value. After all, there are people who actually are (gasp!) moved by her work, including the album you "destroyed".


bandana.blues
 
Posts: 3
Top

Next

Post a reply
30 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

  • Change font size
  • Print view